Western Journal of Emergency Medicine (Mar 2023)

Impact of Emergency Department Crowding on Discharged Patient Experience

  • Yosef Berlyand,
  • Martin S. Copenhaver,
  • Benjamin A. White,
  • Sayon Dutta,
  • Joshua J. Baugh,
  • Susan R. Wilcox,
  • Brian J. Yun,
  • Ali S. Raja,
  • Jonathan D. Sonis

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2022.10.58045
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 2

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: While emergency department (ED) crowding has deleterious effects on patient care outcomes and operational efficiency, impacts on the experience for patients discharged from the ED are unknown. We aimed to study how patient-reported experience is affected by ED crowding to characterize which factors most impact discharged patient experience. Methods: This institutional review board-exempt, retrospective, cohort study included all discharged adult ED patients July 1, 2020–June 30, 2021 with at least some response data to the the National Research Corporation Health survey, sent to most patients discharged from our large, academic medical center ED. Our query yielded 9,401 unique encounters for 9,221 patients. Based on responses to the summary question of whether the patient was likely to recommend our ED, patients were categorized as “detractors” (scores 0–6) or “non-detractors” (scores 7–10). We assessed the relationship between census and patient experience by 1) computing percentage of detractors within each care area and assessing for differences in census and boarder burden between detractors and non-detractors, and 2) multivariable logistic regression assessing the relationship between likelihood of being a detractor in terms of the ED census and the patient’s last ED care area. A second logistic regression controlled for additional patient- and encounter-specific covariates. Results: Survey response rate was 24.8%. Overall, 13.9% of responders were detractors. There was a significant difference in the average overall ED census for detractors (average 3.70 more patients physically present at the time of arrival, 95% CI 2.33–5.07). In unadjusted multivariable analyses, three lower acuity ED care areas showed statistically significant differences of detractor likelihood with changes in patient census. The overall area under the curve (AUC) for the unadjusted model was 0.594 (CI 0.577–0.610). The adjusted model had higher AUC (0.673, CI 0.657–.690]; P<0.001), with the same three care areas having significant differences in detractor likelihood based on patient census changes. Length of stay (OR 1.71, CI 1.50–1.95), leaving against medical advice/without being seen (OR 5.15, CI 3.84–6.89), and the number of ED care areas a patient visited (OR 1.16, CI 1.01–1.33) was associated with an increase in detractor likelihood. Conclusion: Patients arriving to a crowded ED and ultimately discharged are more likely to have negative patient experience. Future studies should characterize which variables most impact patient experience of discharged ED patients.