Андрология и генитальная хирургия (Mar 2022)
Adenoprosin in the complex treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in combination with prostatitis of category III
Abstract
Introduction. The problem of effective and safe therapy of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatitis of category III remains relevant, despite the numerosity of the drugs used in different groups. Under these conditions, the search for new pharmacological agents continues.The study objective was to evaluate the efficacy of Adenoprosin in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction in patients with chronic pelvic pain syndrome and prostate hyperplasia.Materials and methods. The 90-day study included 60 patients aged 40 to 60 years with chronic pelvic pain syndrome and erectile dysfunction on the background of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Patients of the main group received alfa-1-adrenoreceptor blocker tamsulosin for 30 days in combination with the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug nimesulide for 5 days and Adenoprosin suppositories. The men of the control group took tamsulosin for 30 days and nimesulide for 5 days. Over the next 60 days, the dynamics was evaluated based on the data from the NIH-CPSI (National Institutes Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index), IPSS (International Prostate Symptom Score), QoL (Quality of Life Scale), AMS (Aging Male Symptoms), IIEF-5 (International Index of Erectile Function); urination diary analysis; general urine analysis; blood test for the level of prostate specific antigen, glucose; prostate secretion analysis; transrectal ultrasound examination of the prostate gland with measurement of residual urine; uroflowmetry.Results. Urinary frequency decreased at day 30 in the treatment group from 12.7 ± 1.4 to 7.3 ± 1.8 micturitions per day, in the control group from 13.1 ± 1.8 to 9.6 ± 1.1; subsequently (on days 60 and 90) positive effect persisted in the treatment group, while in the control group urinary frequency increased. Per the NIH-CPSI questionnaire, symptoms decreased at day 30: in the treatment group from 25.4 ± 2.1 to 12.3 ± 1.9 points, in the control group from 24.3 ± 1.7 to 17.6 ± 0.4 points; in the treatment group the trend towards symptom decrease remained, while in the control group symptoms increased at day 90. IPSS score at day 30 decreased in the treatment group from 12.9 ± 0.5 to 5.2 ± 1.4, in the control group from 14.1 ± 0.7 to 8.2 ± 0.9; further decrease was observed in both groups at day 60, but at day 90 the score increased (higher in the control group). Quality of life (QoL) improved in both groups at day 30 (in the treatment group 1.4 ± 0.6 points, in the control group 3.1 ± 0.8). Erectile function improved per the IIEF-5 questionnaire: in the treatment group from 11.5 ± 1.1 to 18.9 ± 1.4 points at day 30 with further positive tendency, in the control group from 10.7 ± 1.4 to 15.3 ± 1.1 points with subsequent negative dynamics. Uroflowmetry showed positive dynamics of Q max at the end of treatment in the treatment (from 8.3 ± 1.5 to 14.7 ± 1.1 mL/s) and control (from 8.8 ± 1.3 to 13.1 ± 1.6 mL/s) groups, with its further decrease. Prostate volume in the treatment group was about 33.5 ± 3.1 cm3 at day 90 (with baseline volume 42.6 ± 2.5 cm3), in the control group it was 41.6 ± 1.9 cm3 (with baseline volume of 43.1±1.4 cm3). No significant changes in urine tests, prostatic fluid, prostate-specific antigen level, and blood glucose were observed during the treatment.Conclusions. The study shows that administration of tamsulosin with Adenoprosin in patients with BPH and category III prostatitis is advantageous compared to administration of only alfa-1-adrenoreceptor blockers.
Keywords
