Frontiers in Medicine (Jan 2023)

Performance of Xpert MTB/RIF and sputum microscopy compared to sputum culture for diagnosis of tuberculosis in seven hospitals in Indonesia

  • Anis Karuniawati,
  • Erlina Burhan,
  • Eko Budi Koendhori,
  • Desvita Sari,
  • Budi Haryanto,
  • Titik Nuryastuti,
  • A. A. A. Yuli Gayatri,
  • Uleng Bahrun,
  • R. Lia Kusumawati,
  • Retna Indah Sugiyono,
  • Nugroho Harry Susanto,
  • Aly Diana,
  • Aly Diana,
  • Herman Kosasih,
  • Adhella Menur Naysilla,
  • Dewi Lokida,
  • Aaron Neal,
  • Sophia Siddiqui,
  • Chuen-Yen Lau,
  • Muhammad Karyana

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.909198
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionTuberculosis (TB) is a major public health concern in Indonesia, where the incidence was 301 cases per 100,000 inhabitants in 2020 and the prevalence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) TB is increasing. Diagnostic testing approaches vary across Indonesia due to resource limitations. Acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear is widely used, though Xpert MTB/RIF has been the preferred assay for detecting TB and rifampicin resistance since 2012 due to higher sensitivity and ability to rapidly identify rifampicin resistance. However, <1,000 Xpert instruments were available in Indonesia as of 2020 and the Xpert supply chain has suffered interruptions.MethodsWe compared the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF and AFB smear to facilitate optimization of TB case identification. We analyzed baseline data from a cohort study of adults with pulmonary TB conducted at seven hospitals across Indonesia. We evaluated sensitivity and specificity of AFB smear and Xpert MTB/RIF using Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) culture as the gold standard, factors associated with assay results, and consistency of Xpert MTB/RIF with drug susceptibility test (DST) in detecting rifampicin resistance.ResultsSensitivity of AFB smear was significantly lower than Xpert MTB/RIF (86.2 vs. 97.4%, p-value <0.001), but specificity was significantly better (86.7 vs. 73.3%, p-value <0.001). Performance varied by hospital. Positivity rate for AFB smear and Mtb culture was higher in subjects with pulmonary cavities and in morning sputum samples. Consistency of Xpert MTB/RIF with DST was lower in those with rifampicin- sensitive TB by DST.DiscussionAdditional evaluation using sputa from primary and secondary Indonesian health centers will increase the generalizability of the assessment of AFB smear and Xpert MTB/RIF performance, and better inform health policy.Clinical trial registration[https://clinicaltrials.gov/], identifier [NCT027 58236].

Keywords