PLoS Medicine (Jun 2019)

Effect of pedometer-based walking interventions on long-term health outcomes: Prospective 4-year follow-up of two randomised controlled trials using routine primary care data.

  • Tess Harris,
  • Elizabeth S Limb,
  • Fay Hosking,
  • Iain Carey,
  • Steve DeWilde,
  • Cheryl Furness,
  • Charlotte Wahlich,
  • Shaleen Ahmad,
  • Sally Kerry,
  • Peter Whincup,
  • Christina Victor,
  • Michael Ussher,
  • Steve Iliffe,
  • Ulf Ekelund,
  • Julia Fox-Rushby,
  • Judith Ibison,
  • Derek G Cook

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002836
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 6
p. e1002836

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundData are lacking from physical activity (PA) trials with long-term follow-up of both objectively measured PA levels and robust health outcomes. Two primary care 12-week pedometer-based walking interventions in adults and older adults (PACE-UP and PACE-Lift) found sustained objectively measured PA increases at 3 and 4 years, respectively. We aimed to evaluate trial intervention effects on long-term health outcomes relevant to walking interventions, using routine primary care data.Methods and findingsRandomisation was from October 2012 to November 2013 for PACE-UP participants from seven general (family) practices and October 2011 to October 2012 for PACE-Lift participants from three practices. We downloaded primary care data, masked to intervention or control status, for 1,001 PACE-UP participants aged 45-75 years, 36% (361) male, and 296 PACE-Lift participants, aged 60-75 years, 46% (138) male, who gave written informed consent, for 4-year periods following randomisation. The following new events were counted for all participants, including those with preexisting diseases (apart from diabetes, for which existing cases were excluded): nonfatal cardiovascular, total cardiovascular (including fatal), incident diabetes, depression, fractures, and falls. Intervention effects on time to first event post-randomisation were modelled using Cox regression for all outcomes, except for falls, which used negative binomial regression to allow for multiple events, adjusting for age, sex, and study. Absolute risk reductions (ARRs) and numbers needed to treat (NNTs) were estimated. Data were downloaded for 1,297 (98%) of 1,321 trial participants. Event rates were low (ConclusionsRoutine primary care data used to assess long-term trial outcomes demonstrated significantly fewer new cardiovascular events and fractures in intervention participants at 4 years. No statistically significant differences between intervention and control groups were demonstrated for other events. Short-term primary care pedometer-based walking interventions can produce long-term health benefits and should be more widely used to help address the public health inactivity challenge.Trial registrationsPACE-UP isrctn.com ISRCTN98538934; PACE-Lift isrctn.com ISRCTN42122561.