PLoS ONE (Jan 2024)

Attitudes of women towards intimate partner violence in Guyana: A cross-sectional analytical study.

  • Gary Joseph,
  • Luis Paulo Vidaletti,
  • Cona Husbands,
  • Lisa Edwards,
  • Michelle K James,
  • Charles C Branas,
  • Christopher N Morrison

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303902
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 19, no. 5
p. e0303902

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundTo assess the attitudes of women towards intimate partner violence (IPV) in Guyana.MethodsWe used national data from the publicly available Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) conducted in Guyana in 2019 for women aged 15 to 49 years. The prevalence of women who agreed that a husband is justified in beating his wife was analyzed. Respondent reasons included if she: "goes out without telling him", "neglects the children", "argues with him", "refuses sex with him", "burns the food", "has another partner", "stays out late/partying", "refuses to cook or clean", "overspends", and/or "he doesn't have access to her cellphone". Descriptive analyses were carried for all the variables. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with these 10 respondent reasons, separately and in combination.ResultsThe overall prevalence of women's attitudes justifying IPV against women if there was a 'yes' response to any of the 10 reasons was 17.9% (95%CI: 16.6-19.3%), and varied from 2.7% if she "goes out without telling him", "burns the food", or "overspends" to 10.0% if she "has another partner". This prevalence ranged from 10.2% in urban areas to 19.3% in rural areas (pConclusionOver one-sixth of the respondents agreed that a husband was justified in committing IPV against women in Guyana. Public health programs focusing on geographic locations, ethnicity, and economic status must be implemented to change attitudes justifying IPV and reduce this significant public health challenge.