Life (Aug 2024)

Methylated DNA Markers in Voided Urine for the Identification of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

  • Paras Shah,
  • William R. Taylor,
  • Brianna J. Negaard,
  • Benjamin R. Gochanour,
  • Douglas W. Mahoney,
  • Sara S. Then,
  • Mary E. Devens,
  • Patrick H. Foote,
  • Karen A. Doering,
  • Kelli N. Burger,
  • Brandon Nikolai,
  • Michael W. Kaiser,
  • Hatim T. Allawi,
  • John C. Cheville,
  • John B. Kisiel,
  • Matthew T. Gettman

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/life14081024
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 8
p. 1024

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: Non-invasive assays are needed to better discriminate patients with prostate cancer (PCa) to avoid over-treatment of indolent disease. We analyzed 14 methylated DNA markers (MDMs) from urine samples of patients with biopsy-proven PCa relative to healthy controls and further studied discrimination of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) from healthy controls and Gleason 6 cancers. Methods: To evaluate the panel, urine from 24 healthy male volunteers with no clinical suspicion for PCa and 24 men with biopsy-confirmed disease across all Gleason scores was collected. Blinded to clinical status, DNA from the supernatant was analyzed for methylation signal within specific DNA sequences across 14 genes (HES5, ZNF655, ITPRIPL1, MAX.chr3.6187, SLCO3A1, CHST11, SERPINB9, WNT3A, KCNB2, GAS6, AKR1B1, MAX.chr3.8028, GRASP, ST6GALNAC2) by target enrichment long-probe quantitative-amplified signal assays. Results: Utilizing an overall specificity cut-off of 100% for discriminating normal controls from PCa cases across the MDM panel resulted in 71% sensitivity (95% CI: 49–87%) for PCa detection (4/7 Gleason 6, 8/12 Gleason 7, 5/5 Gleason 8+) and 76% (50–92%) for csPCa (Gleason ≥ 7). At 100% specificity for controls and Gleason 6 patients combined, MDM panel sensitivity was 59% (33–81%) for csPCa (5/12 Gleason 7, 5/5 Gleason 8+). Conclusions: MDMs assayed in urine offer high sensitivity and specificity for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Prospective evaluation is necessary to estimate discrimination of patients as first-line screening and as an adjunct to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing.

Keywords