Damage Generated and Propagated by the AAR Reactive Aggregate from Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

It remains unclear in the literature what the cause of the so-called alkali–carbonate reaction (ACR) damage to concrete is. However, expansion and cracks as distress features are often attributed to the alkali–silica reaction (ASR). Therefore, this work aims to assess the damage to concrete generated and propagated by the so-called ACR-susceptible reactive aggregate through mechanical testing (i.e., the direct shear test), microscopy (the damage rating index—DRI), and other techniques. Distinct induced expansion levels (i.e., 0%, 0.05%, 0.12%, and 0.20%) were selected to compare the distress caused by ACR to concrete affected by ASR. The results show that the behavior of ACR, namely, as captured through the DRI, is inconsistent with that of ASR, thus attesting to ACR being a distinct distress mechanism. The damage captured through mechanical testing does not distinguish ACR from ASR; however, microscopy reveals that cracks in the cement paste are the main damage mechanism. The proportions of cracks in the cement paste are 40–50% of the total number of cracks, whereas open cracks in the aggregates normally characterizing ASR represent only up to 20% of the total cracks.

Keywords

• alkali–aggregate reaction
• alkali–carbonate reaction
• internal swelling reaction
• multi-level assessment
• damage rating index
• semi-quantitative microscopy