Liposomal azelaic acid 20% cream vs hydroquinone 4% cream as adjuvant to oral tranexamic acid in melasma: a comparative study

Abstract

Background Melasma negatively impacts patient’s quality of life (QoL). Although hydroquinone 4% is the most prescribed treatment, several side effects had been reported. The traditionally used azelaic acid 20% has poor tolerability and low skin absorption rate. Aim To assess the efficacy and tolerability of the liposomal form of azelaic acid 20% as an adjuvant to oral tranexamic acid in the treatment of melasma. Patients and methods Fifty females suffering from melasma were divided into two equal groups. The first group used a liposomal form of azelaic acid 20%, and the second group used hydroquinone 4%. Oral tranexamic acid 250 mg was taken by both groups as a single oral daily dose. Melasma severity and the patient’s QoL were assessed. Results A significant improvement of melasma was detected in females who used the liposomal form of azelaic acid 20% than those who used hydroquinone 4%. This was associated with a significant positive effect on their QoL. Furthermore, the liposomal form of azelaic acid 20% was more significantly tolerable than hydroquinone 4%. Conclusion The use of the liposomal form of azelaic acid provides an effective and well-tolerated addition to the treatment of melasma.

Keywords

• melasma
• quality of life
• liposomal
• azelaic acid 20%
• hydroquinone 4%