Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy (Oct 2024)

Association of psychosocial state with subsequent risk of dementia: a prospective cohort study based on the UK Biobank

  • Hongxi Wang,
  • Junren Wang,
  • Yu Zeng,
  • Huazhen Yang,
  • Wenwen Chen,
  • Qing Shen,
  • Huan Song

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-024-01592-8
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 1
pp. 1 – 12

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Multiple psychosocial factors have been associated with dementia, while the individual or joint effects of various psychosocial states on dementia remain unrevealed due to the complex interplay between those factors. Here, the authors examined the associations of psychosocial factors and patterns with subsequent risk of dementia, and if the associations could be modified by genetic susceptibility to dementia. Methods UK Biobank dementia-free participants were followed from one year after recruitment (median date: 24 January, 2010) until 31 October, 2022. Psychosocial states were measured by 22 items related to five dimensions, including psychiatric history, recent stressful life events, current psychiatric symptoms, social contact, and individual socioeconomic state. We identified clusters of individuals with distinct psychosocial patterns using latent class analysis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between psychosocial items, as well as psychosocial patterns, and risk of dementia. We further performed stratification analyses by apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype, polygenic risk score (PRS) of dementia, and family history of dementia. Results Of 497,787 included participants, 54.54% were female. During a median follow-up of 12.70 years, we identified 9,858 (1.98%) patients with newly diagnosed dementia. We identified seven clusters with distinct psychosocial patterns. Compared to individuals with a pattern of ‘good state’, individuals with other unfavorable patterns, featured by varying degrees of poor psychological state (‘fair state’ and ‘mildly, moderately, and extremely poor psychological state’), low social contact or socioeconomic state (‘living alone’ and ‘short education years’), were all at an increased risk of dementia (hazard ratios [HR] between 1.29 and 2.63). The observed associations showed no significant differences across individuals with varying APOE genotypes, levels of PRS, and family histories of dementia. Conclusion Unfavorable psychosocial patterns are associated with an increased risk of dementia, independent of genetic susceptibility. The findings highlight the importance of surveillance and prevention of cognitive decline among individuals with suboptimal psychosocial state.

Keywords