Environment International (Oct 2023)

Particle lung deposited surface area (LDSAal) size distributions in different urban environments and geographical regions: Towards understanding of the PM2.5 dose–response

  • Teemu Lepistö,
  • Henna Lintusaari,
  • Anna Oudin,
  • Luis M.F. Barreira,
  • Jarkko V. Niemi,
  • Panu Karjalainen,
  • Laura Salo,
  • Ville Silvonen,
  • Lassi Markkula,
  • Jussi Hoivala,
  • Petteri Marjanen,
  • Sampsa Martikainen,
  • Minna Aurela,
  • Felipe Reyes Reyes,
  • Pedro Oyola,
  • Heino Kuuluvainen,
  • Hanna E. Manninen,
  • Roel P.F. Schins,
  • Michal Vojtisek-Lom,
  • Jakub Ondracek,
  • Jan Topinka,
  • Hilkka Timonen,
  • Pasi Jalava,
  • Sanna Saarikoski,
  • Topi Rönkkö

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 180
p. 108224

Abstract

Read online

Recent studies indicate that monitoring only fine particulate matter (PM2.5) may not be enough to understand and tackle the health risk caused by particulate pollution. Health effects per unit PM2.5 seem to increase in countries with low PM2.5, but also near local pollution sources (e.g., traffic) within cities. The aim of this study is to understand the differences in the characteristics of lung-depositing particles in different geographical regions and urban environments. Particle lung deposited surface area (LDSAal) concentrations and size distributions, along with PM2.5, were compared with ambient measurement data from Finland, Germany, Czechia, Chile, and India, covering traffic sites, residential areas, airports, shipping, and industrial sites. In Finland (low PM2.5), LDSAal size distributions depended significantly on the urban environment and were mainly attributable to ultrafine particles (<100 nm). In Central Europe (moderate PM2.5), LDSAal was also dependent on the urban environment, but furthermore heavily influenced by the regional aerosol. In Chile and India (high PM2.5), LDSAal was mostly contributed by the regional aerosol despite that the measurements were done at busy traffic sites. The results indicate that the characteristics of lung-depositing particles vary significantly both within cities and between geographical regions. In addition, ratio between LDSAal and PM2.5 depended notably on the environment and the country, suggesting that LDSAal exposure per unit PM2.5 may be multiple times higher in areas having low PM2.5 compared to areas with continuously high PM2.5. These findings may partly explain why PM2.5 seems more toxic near local pollution sources and in areas with low PM2.5. Furthermore, performance of a typical sensor based LDSAal measurement is discussed and a new LDSAal2.5 notation indicating deposition region and particle size range is introduced. Overall, the study emphasizes the need for country-specific emission mitigation strategies, and the potential of LDSAal concentration as a health-relevant pollution metric.

Keywords