Collecting antibodies and large molecule biomarkers in mouse interstitial brain fluid: a comparison of microdialysis and cerebral open flow microperfusion

Abstract

The determination of concentrations of large therapeutic molecules, like monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), in the interstitial brain fluid (ISF) is one of the cornerstones for the translation from preclinical species to humans of treatments for neurodegenerative diseases. Microdialysis (MD) and cerebral open flow microperfusion (cOFM) are the only currently available methods for extracting ISF, and their use and characterization for the collection of large molecules in rodents have barely started. For the first time, we compared both methods at a technical and performance level for measuring ISF concentrations of a non-target-binding mAb, trastuzumab, in awake and freely moving mice. Without correction of the data for recovery, concentrations of samples are over 10-fold higher through cOFM compared to MD. The overall similar pharmacokinetic profile and ISF exposure between MD (corrected for recovery) and cOFM indicate an underestimation of the absolute concentrations calculated with in vitro recovery. In vivo recovery (zero-flow rate method) revealed an increased extraction of trastuzumab at low flow rates and a 6-fold higher absolute concentration at steady state than initially calculated with the in vitro recovery. Technical optimizations have significantly increased the performance of both systems, resulting in the possibility of sampling up to 12 mice simultaneously. Moreover, strict aseptic conditions have played an important role in improving data quality. The standardization of these complex methods makes the unraveling of ISF concentrations attainable for various diseases and modalities, starting in this study with mAbs, but extending further in the future to RNA therapeutics, antibody-drug conjugates, and even cell therapies.

Keywords

• Microdialysis
• open flow microperfusion
• antibodies
• interstitial fluid
• absolute quantification