International Journal of Hyperthermia (Jan 2019)

Safety and efficacy of thermal ablation (radiofrequency and laser): should we treat all types of thyroid nodules?

  • Adrien Ben Hamou,
  • Edouard Ghanassia,
  • Stephanie Espiard,
  • Henry Abi Rached,
  • Arnaud Jannin,
  • Jean Michel Correas,
  • Christine Do Cao,
  • Maeva Kyheng,
  • Marie Christine Vantyghem,
  • Herve Monpeyssen

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2019.1627432
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 36, no. 1
pp. 665 – 675

Abstract

Read online

Background: Thermal ablation is a minimally invasive technique that is gradually acknowledged as an effective alternative to surgery to treat thyroid nodules. Two main techniques have been described: radiofrequency (RFA) and laser ablation. Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the two main techniques (RFA and laser ablation) for the treatment of benign thyroid nodules. Patients: This bicentric retrospective study included 166 consecutive patients, who received clinical, biological and ultrasound evaluations for thyroid nodules, from October 2013 to November 2017. Methods: One of the two techniques was proposed if a nodule was proven to be benign after fine needle aspiration cytology or micro-biopsy. Adverse events and outcomes (symptoms, nodule reduction) were assessed at 6 weeks and 6, 12, and 18 months after treatment. Results: One hundred and eighty-nine nodules (mean size 17.5 ± 16.9 mL, 86.1% palpable) were treated by RFA (n = 108 (57.1%)) or laser ablation (n = 81 (42.9%)) in 166 patients (80.1% women, mean age 51.7 years). Two cases of transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, one hematoma, and two successfully drained abscesses (5/166 = 3%) were observed. Clinical symptoms improved significantly in the two groups (anterior cervical discomfort –83.6%, esthetic complaints –84.9% and dysphagia –86.4%). Nodule volume (mL) decreased significantly (baseline vs. 18 months) from 20.4 ± 18.6 to 5.8 ± 6.6 (−75%) in the RFA, and from 13.6 ± 13.3 to 3.4 ± 4.1 (−83.9%) in the laser ablation groups. Conclusions: Transient but potentially serious adverse events were reported in 3% of patients. A significant volumetric reduction was achieved with both techniques, regardless of nodule’s characteristics, at 18 months.

Keywords