Nature Communications (Jan 2024)

Neoadjuvant camrelizumab and apatinib combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for locally advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter randomized phase 2 trial

  • Jian-Xian Lin,
  • Yi-Hui Tang,
  • Hua-Long Zheng,
  • Kai Ye,
  • Jian-Chun Cai,
  • Li-Sheng Cai,
  • Wei Lin,
  • Jian-Wei Xie,
  • Jia-Bin Wang,
  • Jun Lu,
  • Qi-Yue Chen,
  • Long-Long Cao,
  • Chao-Hui Zheng,
  • Ping Li,
  • Chang-Ming Huang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-44309-5
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 1
pp. 1 – 12

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Prospective evidence regarding the combination of programmed cell death (PD)−1 and angiogenesis inhibitors in treating locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) is limited. In this multicenter, randomized, phase 2 trial (NCT04195828), patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (clinical T2-4N + M0) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive neoadjuvant camrelizumab and apatinib combined with nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 (CA-SAP) or chemotherapy SAP alone (SAP) for 3 cycles. The primary endpoint was the major pathological response (MPR), defined as <10% residual tumor cells in resection specimens. Secondary endpoints included R0 resection rate, radiologic response, safety, overall survival, and progression-free survival. The modified intention-to-treat population was analyzed (CA-SAP [n = 51] versus SAP [n = 53]). The trial has met pre-specified endpoints. CA-SAP was associated with a significantly higher MPR rate (33.3%) than SAP (17.0%, P = 0.044). The CA-SAP group had a significantly higher objective response rate (66.0% versus 43.4%, P = 0.017) and R0 resection rate (94.1% versus 81.1%, P = 0.042) than the SAP group. Nonsurgical grade 3-4 adverse events were observed in 17 patients (33.3%) in the CA-SAP group and 14 (26.4%) in the SAP group. Survival results were not reported due to immature data. Camrelizumab and apatinib combined with chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant regimen was tolerable and associated with favorable responses for LAGC.