Superiority of 3D transesophageal echocardiography in assessment of mechanical prosthetic valve dysfunction as compared to 2D transesophageal echocardiography

Abstract

Objective: The advent of 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was supposed to facilitate more accurate etiological diagnosis of prosthetic valve dysfunction as compared to 2D TEE; however, data to support the same is sparse especially in Asian Indians. Methods: This was a prospective, open- label study of 50 consecutive patients with prosthetic valve dysfunction who were eligible for the study. All patients underwent both 2D and 3D TEE for assessment of prosthetic valve dysfunction apart from their demographics, clinical evaluation, laboratory assessment and fluoroscopy. Results: Of 50 patients, 12 had aortic valve prosthetic dysfunction and 38 patients had mitral valve prosthesis dysfunction. Of these, 10 were male and remaining 40 were female patients. Overall, 41 (82%) patients had subtherapeutic prothrombin time at the time of presentation. Thrombus in situ was visualized in 34% of patients with 3D TEE as compared to 2D TEE (4%) (p=0.004). Pannus formation was observed in 20% of patients with 3D TEE as compared to 2D TEE, which could not identify pannus formation in any patient (p=0.03). In 34% of patients, normal motion of leaflets could be seen using 3D TEE as compared to 30% of patients by 2D TEE. Conclusion: Compared to 2D TEE, 3D TEE imaging offers superior capabilities in assessing prosthetic valve dysfunction, particularly when evaluating thrombus and pannus formation. Additionally, both modalities show nearly similar effectiveness in assessing leaflet motion.

Keywords

• 3d echocardiography
• prosthetic valve
• prosthetic valve dysfunction