BMC Health Services Research (Dec 2019)

Implementation of a billable transitional care model for stroke patients: the COMPASS study

  • Sabina B. Gesell,
  • Cheryl D. Bushnell,
  • Sara B. Jones,
  • Sylvia W. Coleman,
  • Samantha M. Levy,
  • James G. Xenakis,
  • Barbara J. Lutz,
  • Janet Prvu Bettger,
  • Janet Freburger,
  • Jacqueline R. Halladay,
  • Anna M. Johnson,
  • Anna M. Kucharska-Newton,
  • Laurie H. Mettam,
  • Amy M. Pastva,
  • Matthew A. Psioda,
  • Meghan D. Radman,
  • Wayne D. Rosamond,
  • Mysha E. Sissine,
  • Joanne Halls,
  • Pamela W. Duncan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4771-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 19, no. 1
pp. 1 – 14

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The COMprehensive Post-Acute Stroke Services (COMPASS) pragmatic trial compared the effectiveness of comprehensive transitional care (COMPASS-TC) versus usual care among stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients discharged home from North Carolina hospitals. We evaluated implementation of COMPASS-TC in 20 hospitals randomized to the intervention using the RE-AIM framework. Methods We evaluated hospital-level Adoption of COMPASS-TC; patient Reach (meeting transitional care management requirements of timely telephone and face-to-face follow-up); Implementation using hospital quality measures (concurrent enrollment, two-day telephone follow-up, 14-day clinic visit scheduling); and hospital-level sustainability (Maintenance). Effectiveness compared 90-day physical function (Stroke Impact Scale-16), between patients receiving COMPASS-TC versus not. Associations between hospital and patient characteristics with Implementation and Reach measures were estimated with mixed logistic regression models. Results Adoption: Of 95 eligible hospitals, 41 (43%) participated in the trial. Of the 20 hospitals randomized to the intervention, 19 (95%) initiated COMPASS-TC. Reach: A total of 24% (656/2751) of patients enrolled received a billable TC intervention, ranging from 6 to 66% across hospitals. Implementation: Of eligible patients enrolled, 75.9% received two-day calls (or two attempts) and 77.5% were scheduled/offered clinic visits. Most completed visits (78% of 975) occurred within 14 days. Effectiveness: Physical function was better among patients who attended a 14-day visit versus those who did not (adjusted mean difference: 3.84, 95% CI 1.42–6.27, p = 0.002). Maintenance: Of the 19 adopting hospitals, 14 (74%) sustained COMPASS-TC. Conclusions COMPASS-TC implementation varied widely. The greatest challenge was reaching patients because of system difficulties maintaining consistent delivery of follow-up visits and patient preferences to pursue alternate post-acute care. Receiving COMPASS-TC was associated with better functional status. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02588664. Registered 28 October 2015.

Keywords