PLoS ONE (Jan 2023)

Temporal trends in, and associations of, early-career general practitioner prescriptions of second-line Type 2 Diabetes medications, 2010-2018.

  • Irena Patsan,
  • Amanda Tapley,
  • Peter Davoren,
  • Alison Fielding,
  • Elizabeth Holliday,
  • Jean Ball,
  • Andrew Davey,
  • Mieke van Driel,
  • Rachel Turner,
  • Katie Mulquiney,
  • Neil Spike,
  • Kristen FitzGerald,
  • Parker Magin

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280668
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 1
p. e0280668

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionSecond-line pharmacotherapy for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ('diabetes') is necessary for optimal glycaemic control and preventing longer-term complications. We aimed to describe temporal trends in, and associations of, Australian general practitioner (GP) registrars' prescription, and initiation, of 'new' second-line oral agents (dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists) compared to sulphonylureas.Materials and methodsA longitudinal analysis (2010-2018) of data from the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training project. Analysis included any diabetes problem/diagnosis that involved prescription of sulphonylureas or 'new' oral agents. Simple and multiple logistic regression models were fitted within the generalised estimating equations framework.Results2333 registrars recorded 6064 diabetes problems/diagnoses (1.4%). 835 problems/diagnoses involved sulphonylurea or 'new' medication prescription. Of these, 61.0% [95% CI:57.4-64.4] involved 'new' medication prescription. 230 problems/diagnoses involved sulphonylurea or 'new' medication initiation, with 77% [95%CI:70.8-82.1] involving a 'new' medication. There was a significant 52% per year increase in prescribing (OR = 1.52[95% CI:1.38-1.68],pConclusionRegistrar uptake of 'new' oral agents compared to sulphonylureas has increased rapidly.