The Astrophysical Journal (Jan 2024)

A New Rarity Assessment of the “Disk of Satellites”: The Milky Way System Is the Exception Rather Than the Rule in the ΛCDM Cosmology

  • Chanoul Seo,
  • Suk-Jin Yoon,
  • Sanjaya Paudel,
  • Sung-Ho An,
  • Jun-Sung Moon

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad8634
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 976, no. 2
p. 253

Abstract

Read online

The majority of satellite galaxies around the Milky Way (MW) show disk-like distributions (the disk of satellites; DoS), which is a small-scale problem of the lambda cold dark matter cosmology. The conventional definition of the MW-like DoS is a satellite system with a minor-to-major axis ratio ( c / a ) lower than the MW’s c / a value of 0.181. Here, we question the validity of the c / a -based DoS rarity assessment and propose an alternative approach. How satellites are placed around a galaxy is dictated mainly by two factors: the distributions of the satellites’ orbital poles and their distances from the host. Based on this premise, we construct the “satellite distribution generator” code and generate 10 ^5 spatially and kinematically analogous systems (SKASs) sharing these two factors. The SKAS can disclose the intrinsic, underlying c / a probability distribution function (PDF), from which a present-day c / a value is fortuitously determined. We find that the c / a PDF of the MW DoS defined by 11 classical satellites is quite broad ( σ _c _/ _a ∼ 0.105), implying that a simple present-day c / a value, combined with its highly time-variable nature, cannot fully represent the degree of flatness. Moreover, based on the intrinsic c / a PDF, we reevaluate the rarity of the MW DoS by comparing it with Illustris TNG50-1 host–satellite systems and find that even with the new measure, the MW DoS remains rare (0.00%–3.40%). We show that the reason behind the rareness is that both orbital poles and distances of the 11 MW satellites are far more plane-friendly than those of simulated host–satellite systems, challenging the current structure and galaxy formation model.

Keywords