Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection (Aug 2017)

Evaluation of performance of human immunodeficiency virus antigen/antibody combination assays in Taiwan

  • Chun-Kai Chang,
  • Cheng-Feng Kao,
  • Pi-Han Lin,
  • Hui-Lin Huang,
  • Shu-Yuan Ho,
  • Kuo-Chen Wong,
  • Bo-Chang Lin,
  • Chang-Ching Yeh,
  • Chia-Yeh Lee,
  • Chuan-Liang Kao,
  • Chun-Nan Lee,
  • Sui-Yuan Chang,
  • Jyh-Yuan Yang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2015.07.009
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 50, no. 4
pp. 440 – 447

Abstract

Read online

Background: The fourth-generation human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) combination assay, which can simultaneously detect the presence of anti-HIV antibody and HIV antigen, has been shown to shorten the window period in HIV diagnosis compared with the third-generation HIV antibody immunoassay. This study was aimed to determine the performance of HIV combination assays in Taiwan, where the HIV-1 seroprevalence is 0.007% and HIV-2 infection has never been reported. Methods: Performance of three fourth-generation HIV Ag/Ab combination assays (Dia.Pro, Wantai, and Bio-Rad) and one third-generation HIV Ab immunoassay (AxSYM HIV 1/2 gO) was assessed. Results: A total of 152 specimens, including 86 confirmed HIV-seropositive and 66 HIV-seronegative samples, were used in the study. The sensitivity of four assays varied from 98.8% to 100%, and specificity varied from 98.5% to 100%. Performance of the 75 equivocal samples, the HIV status of which was confirmed later, in terms of negative prediction varied from 81.8% to 87.5%. The Bio-Rad and Dia.Pro assays exhibited higher sensitivity for the detection of p24 antigen among the three fourth-generation HIV combination assays. Conclusion: The three fourth-generation HIV Ag/Ab combination assays exhibited better sensitivity, specificity, and negative prediction than the third-generation HIV Ab immunoassay.

Keywords