BMC Rheumatology (Oct 2024)

Survey self-report of rheumatoid arthritis and treatments versus specialist clinician confirmation

  • Shamil Jugnundan,
  • Gabriela Schmajuk,
  • Laura Trupin,
  • Paul D. Blanc

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41927-024-00425-3
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 1
pp. 1 – 4

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Objective To assess agreement between patient survey report and physician recorded arthritic conditions and medication use in order to validate population-based epidemiologic approaches to auto-immune arthritic conditions. Methods Rheumatologists in the U.S. Appalachian region recruited men 50 years or older with a confirmed rheumatoid arthritis (RA) diagnosis. For each participating patient, the treating specialist completed a brief chart abstraction that included rheumatic diagnosis and corresponding treatment. Patients participated in a telephone interview using the same questionnaire as applied in a larger random digit dial survey that queried arthritis diagnosis and treatment. We assessed patient-clinician agreement with the Prevalence Adjusted and Biased Adjusted Kappa (PABAK) statistic. Results We included 36 patient-clinician dyads in this analysis. All clinicians and patients concurred in the RA diagnosis (PABAK = 1). For concomitant systemic lupus and scleroderma, we observed generally concordant responses (PABAK 0.89 and 1, respectively). For medication use, for hydroxychloroquine or sulfasalazine was associated with the lowest PABAK (0.39), intermediate values for methotrexate and for the “other conventional synthetic DMARDs” category (0.67), and with the highest agreement PABAK value for the “biologic DMARD or JAK 2 inhibitor” category (0.89). Conclusion Survey-based self-report of RA offers a useful approach in epidemiological investigation. This is particularly relevant to population-based approaches to autoimmune arthritis related to occupational and environmental factors.