Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine (Feb 2020)

Lessons learned from expanded reproductive carrier screening in self‐reported Ashkenazi, Sephardi, and Mizrahi Jewish patients

  • Gidon Akler,
  • Ashley H. Birch,
  • Nicole Schreiber‐Agus,
  • Xiaoqiang Cai,
  • Guiqing Cai,
  • Lisong Shi,
  • Chunli Yu,
  • Anastasia M. Larmore,
  • Geetu Mendiratta‐Vij,
  • Lama Elkhoury,
  • Mitchell W. Dillon,
  • Jun Zhu,
  • Andrew S. Mclellan,
  • Funda E. Suer,
  • Bryn D. Webb,
  • Eric E. Schadt,
  • Ruth Kornreich,
  • Lisa Edelmann

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1053
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 2
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Next‐generation sequencing (NGS)‐based panels have gained traction as a strategy for reproductive carrier screening. Their value for screening Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) individuals, who have benefited greatly from population‐wide targeted testing, as well as Sephardi/Mizrahi Jewish (SMJ) individuals (an underserved population), has not been fully explored. Methods The clinical utilization by 6,805 self‐reported Jewish individuals of an expanded NGS panel, along with several ancillary assays, was assessed retrospectively. Data were extracted for a subset of 96 diseases that, during the panel design phase, were classified as being AJ‐, SMJ‐, or pan‐Jewish/pan‐ethnic‐relevant. Results 64.6% of individuals were identified as carriers of one or more of these 96 diseases. Over 80% of the reported variants would have been missed by following recommended AJ screening guidelines. 10.7% of variants reported for AJs were in “SMJ‐relevant genes,” and 31.2% reported for SMJs were in “AJ‐relevant genes.” Roughly 2.5% of individuals carried a novel, likely pathogenic variant. One in 16 linked cohort couples was identified as a carrier couple for at least one of these 96 diseases. Conclusion For maximal carrier identification, this study supports using expanded NGS panels for individuals of all Jewish backgrounds. This approach can better empower at‐risk couples for reproductive decision making.

Keywords