BMC Geriatrics (Oct 2017)

Explaining discrepancies in self-reported quality of life in frail older people: a mixed-methods study

  • Anne van der Vorst,
  • G. A. Rixt Zijlstra,
  • Nico De Witte,
  • Ruth G. M. Vogel,
  • Jos M. G. A. Schols,
  • Gertrudis I. J. M. Kempen,
  • D-SCOPE Consortium

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0641-y
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 1
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Most research on multidimensional frailty focuses on deficits and risks of adverse outcomes. However, although some frail older people report a low quality of life (QoL), others still report a relatively high QoL. More knowledge about these discrepancies might give new insight into developing frailty prevention strategies. Therefore, this mixed-method study aimed (a) to identify characteristics related to QoL among frail older people; and (b) to explain discrepancies between higher and lower levels of QoL, with a specific interest in identifying strengths frail older people with a higher QoL still have. Methods Semi-structured interviews were held with community-dwelling, frail older people with higher (n = 16) and lower levels of QoL (n = 18). Frailty was assessed with the Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Instrument, which measures environmental, physical, psychological, and social frailty. Other quantitative measures included socio-demographic characteristics, overall QoL, meaning in life, and mastery. The qualitative part focused on the meaning and maintenance of QoL (among other factors), despite being frail. Possible explanations for discrepancies in QoL were explored. Results Frail older people with a higher QoL were older, had lower levels of psychological frailty, and reported higher meaning in life compared to those with a lower QoL. Outcomes of qualitative analysis showed that participants in the high QoL subgroup adapted more effectively to difficulties, had more things in prospect, performed more activities, and were more satisfied with their social network compared to the low QoL subgroup. Conclusion This exploratory study suggests possibilities to promote and improve QoL by strengthening specific resources among frail older people.

Keywords