European Urology Open Science (Jul 2024)

Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection as Treatment for Low-volume Metastatic Seminoma in a Population-based Cohort: The Swedish Norwegian Testicular Cancer Group Experience

  • Anna Thor,
  • Helene F.S. Negaard,
  • Anna Grenabo Bergdahl,
  • Bjarte Almås,
  • Signe Melsen Larsen,
  • Per-Olof Lundgren,
  • Axel Gerdtsson,
  • Dag Halvorsen,
  • Berglind Johannsdottir,
  • Anna K. Jansson,
  • Martin Hellström,
  • Rolf Wahlqvist,
  • Carl W. Langberg,
  • Annika Hedlund,
  • Olof Akre,
  • Ingrid Glimelius,
  • Olof Ståhl,
  • Hege Sagstuen Haugnes,
  • Gabriella Cohn-Cedermark,
  • Anders Kjellman,
  • Torgrim Tandstad

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 65
pp. 13 – 19

Abstract

Read online

Background and objective: There is an unmet need to avoid long-term morbidity associated with standard cytotoxic treatment for low-volume metastatic seminoma. Our aim was to assess the oncological efficacy and surgical safety of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) as treatment in a population-based cohort of metastatic seminoma patients with limited retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy. Methods: Sixty-two seminoma patients in Norway and Sweden were included in the cohort from 2019 to 2022. Patients with lymphadenopathy ≤3 cm, having primary clinical stage (CS) IIA/B or CS I with a relapse, were operated with uni- or bilateral template RPLND, open or robot assisted. The outcome measures included surgical complications as per Clavien-Dindo, and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for 24-mo progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Key findings and limitations: In the cohort, 33 (53%) had CS I with a relapse during surveillance, six (10%) CS I with a relapse following adjuvant chemotherapy, and 23 (37%) initial CS IIA/B. Metastatic seminoma was verified in 58 patients (94%) with a median largest diameter of 18 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 13–24). Robot-assisted RPLND was performed in 40 patients (65%). Clavien-Dindo III complications were observed in three patients (5%); no grade ≥IV complications occurred. Eighteen patients (29%) received adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. The median follow-up was 23 mo (IQR 16–30), and recurrence occurred in six patients (10%) after a median of 8 mo (IQR 4–14). PFS was 90% (95% confidence interval: 0.86–1) and OS was 100% at 24 mo. Conclusions and clinical implications: RPLND as primary treatment is an option for selected low-stage seminomas with a limited burden of disease, showing low complications and low relapse rates, with the potential to reduce long-term morbidity. Patient summary: In seminoma patients with limited metastatic spread, surgery is a treatment option offering an alternative to chemotherapy or radiation. This paper covers the first 62 patients operated in Norway and Sweden.

Keywords