Haematologica (Apr 2019)

THROMBOTECT – a randomized study comparing low molecular weight heparin, antithrombin and unfractionated heparin for thromboprophylaxis during induction therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children and adolescents

  • Jeanette Greiner,
  • Martin Schrappe,
  • Alexander Claviez,
  • Martin Zimmermann,
  • Charlotte Niemeyer,
  • Reinhard Kolb,
  • Wolfgang Eberl,
  • Frank Berthold,
  • Eva Bergsträsser,
  • Astrid Gnekow,
  • Elisabeth Lassay,
  • Peter Vorwerk,
  • Melchior Lauten,
  • Axel Sauerbrey,
  • Johannes Rischewski,
  • Andreas Beilken,
  • Günter Henze,
  • Wolfgang Korte,
  • Anja Möricke,
  • for the THROMBOTECT Study Investigators

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2018.194175
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 104, no. 4

Abstract

Read online

Thromboembolism is a serious complication of induction therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. We prospectively compared the efficacy and safety of antithrombotic interventions in the consecutive leukemia trials ALL-BFM 2000 and AIEOP-BFM ALL 2009. Patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=949, age 1 to 18 years) were randomized to receive low-dose unfractionated heparin, prophylactic low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin) or activity-adapted antithrombin throughout induction therapy. The primary objective of the study was to determine whether enoxaparin or antithrombin reduces the incidence of thromboembolism as compared to unfractionated heparin. The principal safety outcome was hemorrhage; leukemia outcome was a secondary endpoint. Thromboembolism occurred in 42 patients (4.4%). Patients assigned to unfractionated heparin had a higher risk of thromboembolism (8.0%) compared with those randomized to enoxaparin (3.5%; P=0.011) or antithrombin (1.9%; P