PLoS ONE (Jan 2023)

Is learning a logographic script easier than reading an alphabetic script for German children with dyslexia?

  • Stephan Kuester-Gruber,
  • Theda Faisst,
  • Vera Schick,
  • Giulia Righetti,
  • Christoph Braun,
  • Angelika Cordey-Henke,
  • Matthias Klosinski,
  • Ching-Chu Sun,
  • Susanne Trauzettel-Klosinski

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282200
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 2
p. e0282200

Abstract

Read online

PurposeDevelopmental dyslexia in alphabetic languages (DD) is characterized by a phonological deficit. Since logographic scripts rely predominantly on visual and morphological processing, reading performance in DD can be assumed to be less impaired when reading logographic scripts.Methods40 German-speaking children (18 with DD, 22 not reading-impaired-group C; 9-11 years) received Chinese lessons. Eye movements (EM) were recorded during naming single alphabetic words, pictures (confrontational) and Chinese characters to be named in German and Chinese. The main outcome variables were: Articulation latency, numbers and durations of fixations. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed by questionnaires.ResultsWhile reading alphabetic words, articulation latencies and numbers of fixations were significantly higher for group DD than for group C (AL-DD = 1.13, AL-C = 0.84, pConclusionsChildren with dyslexia performed as well as group C during naming Chinese characters in German and in Chinese regarding their EM variables, presumably because they processed Chinese characters by the visuo-spatial pathway with direct access to the semantic system. However, the significantly lower percentage of correct answers especially during Chinese naming showed that group DD had more difficulties naming Chinese characters than group C, which could be attributed to their phonological deficit, among other factors.Trial registrationGerman clinical trials register (DRKS00015697).