Journal of Clinical Medicine (Sep 2019)

Risk Model Assessment in Early-Onset and Adult-Onset Schizophrenia Using Neurological Soft Signs

  • Bao-Yu Chen,
  • I-Ning Tsai,
  • Jin-Jia Lin,
  • Ming-Kun Lu,
  • Hung-Pin Tan,
  • Fong-Lin Jang,
  • Shu-Ting Gan,
  • Sheng-Hsiang Lin

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091443
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 9
p. 1443

Abstract

Read online

Age at onset is one of the most important clinical features of schizophrenia that could indicate greater genetic loadings. Neurological soft signs (NSS) are considered as a potential endophenotype for schizophrenia. However, the association between NSS and different age-onset schizophrenia still remains unclear. We aimed to compare risk model in patients with early-onset schizophrenia (EOS) and adult-onset schizophrenia (AOS) with NSS. This study included 262 schizophrenia patients, 177 unaffected first-degree relatives and 243 healthy controls. We estimated the discriminant abilities of NSS models for early-onset schizophrenia (onset age < 20) and adult-onset schizophrenia (onset age ≥ 20) using three data mining methods: artificial neural networks (ANN), decision trees (DT) and logistic regression (LR). We then assessed the magnitude of NSS performance in EOS and AOS families. For the four NSS subscales, the NSS performance were greater in EOS and AOS families compared with healthy individuals. More interestingly, there were significant differences found between patients’ families and control group in the four subscales of NSS. These findings support the potential for neurodevelopmental markers to be used as schizophrenia vulnerability indicators. The NSS models had higher discriminant abilities for EOS than for AOS. NSS were more accurate in distinguishing EOS patients from healthy controls compared to AOS patients. Our results support the neurodevelopmental hypothesis that EOS has poorer performance of NSS than AOS. Hence, poorer NSS performance may be imply trait-related NSS feature in EOS.

Keywords