Frontiers in Public Health (Apr 2024)

Cross-border mobility in the Meuse-Rhine Euroregion: impact of COVID-19 border restrictions on everyday activities and visiting social network members

  • Céline J. A. van Bilsen,
  • Céline J. A. van Bilsen,
  • Stephanie Brinkhues,
  • Christian J. P. A. Hoebe,
  • Christian J. P. A. Hoebe,
  • Christian J. P. A. Hoebe,
  • Christina Stabourlos,
  • Chrissy P. B. Moonen,
  • Chrissy P. B. Moonen,
  • Stefaan Demarest,
  • Daniëlle A. T. Hanssen,
  • Daniëlle A. T. Hanssen,
  • Inge H. M. van Loo,
  • Inge H. M. van Loo,
  • Paul H. M. Savelkoul,
  • Paul H. M. Savelkoul,
  • Dirk Philippsen,
  • Brigitte A. M. van der Zanden,
  • Nicole H. T. M. Dukers-Muijrers,
  • Nicole H. T. M. Dukers-Muijrers

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1281072
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionCross-border mobility (CBM) to visit social network members or for everyday activities is an important part of daily life for citizens in border regions, including the Meuse-Rhine Euroregion (EMR: neighboring regions from the Netherlands, Belgium, and Germany). We assessed changes in CBM during the COVID-19 pandemic and how participants experienced border restrictions.MethodsImpact of COVID-19 on the EMR’ is a longitudinal study using comparative cross-border data collection. In 2021, a random sample of the EMR-population was invited for participation in online surveys to assess current and pre-pandemic CBM. Changes in CBM, experience of border restrictions, and associated factors were analyzed using multinomial and multivariable logistic regression analysis.ResultsPre-pandemic, 82% of all 3,543 participants reported any CBM: 31% for social contacts and 79% for everyday activities. Among these, 26% decreased social CBM and 35% decreased CBM for everyday activities by autumn 2021. Negative experience of border restrictions was reported by 45% of participants with pre-pandemic CBM, and was higher (p < 0.05) in Dutch participants (compared to Belgian; aOR= 1.4), cross-border [work] commuters (aOR= 2.2), participants with cross-border social networks of friends, family or acquaintances (aOR= 1.3), and those finding the measures ‘limit group size’ (aOR= 1.5) and ‘minimalize travel’ (aOR= 2.0) difficult to adhere to and finding ‘minimalize travel’ (aOR= 1.6) useless.DiscussionCBM for social contacts and everyday activities was substantial in EMR-citizens, but decreased during the pandemic. Border restrictions were valued as negative by a considerable portion of EMR-citizens, especially when having family or friends across the border. When designing future pandemic control strategies, policy makers should account for the negative impact of CBM restrictions on their citizens.

Keywords