Fluids (Apr 2024)

Turbulent Flow Prediction-Simulation: Strained Flow with Initial Isotropic Condition Using a GRU Model Trained by an Experimental Lagrangian Framework, with Emphasis on Hyperparameter Optimization

  • Reza Hassanian,
  • Marcel Aach,
  • Andreas Lintermann,
  • Ásdís Helgadóttir,
  • Morris Riedel

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids9040084
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 4
p. 84

Abstract

Read online

This study presents a novel approach to using a gated recurrent unit (GRU) model, a deep neural network, to predict turbulent flows in a Lagrangian framework. The emerging velocity field is predicted based on experimental data from a strained turbulent flow, which was initially a nearly homogeneous isotropic turbulent flow at the measurement area. The distorted turbulent flow has a Taylor microscale Reynolds number in the range of 100 Reλ s−1 in the Y direction. The measurement is conducted in the presence of gravity consequent to the actual condition, an effect that is usually neglected and has not been investigated in most numerical studies. A Lagrangian particle tracking technique is used to extract the flow characterizations. It is used to assess the capability of the GRU model to forecast the unknown turbulent flow pattern affected by distortion and gravity using spatiotemporal input data. Using the flow track’s location (spatial) and time (temporal) highlights the model’s superiority. The suggested approach provides the possibility to predict the emerging pattern of the strained turbulent flow properties observed in many natural and artificial phenomena. In order to optimize the consumed computing, hyperparameter optimization (HPO) is used to improve the GRU model performance by 14–20%. Model training and inference run on the high-performance computing (HPC) JUWELS-BOOSTER and DEEP-DAM systems at the Jülich Supercomputing Centre, and the code speed-up on these machines is measured. The proposed model produces accurate predictions for turbulent flows in the Lagrangian view with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.001 and an R2 score of 0.993.

Keywords