Effects of PEEP on regional ventilation-perfusion mismatch in the acute respiratory distress syndrome

Abstract

Abstract Purpose In the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), decreasing Ventilation-Perfusion $$\left( {{{\dot{V}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\dot{V}} {\dot{Q}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\dot{Q}}}} \right)$$ V ˙ / Q ˙ mismatch might enhance lung protection. We investigated the regional effects of higher Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) on $${{\dot{V}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\dot{V}} {\dot{Q}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\dot{Q}}}$$ V ˙ / Q ˙ mismatch and their correlation with recruitability. We aimed to verify whether PEEP improves regional $${{\dot{V}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\dot{V}} {\dot{Q}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\dot{Q}}}$$ V ˙ / Q ˙ mismatch, and to study the underlying mechanisms. Methods In fifteen patients with moderate and severe ARDS, two PEEP levels (5 and 15 cmH2O) were applied in random order. $${{\dot{V}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\dot{V}} {\dot{Q}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\dot{Q}}}$$ V ˙ / Q ˙ mismatch was assessed by Electrical Impedance Tomography at each PEEP. Percentage of ventilation and perfusion reaching different ranges of $${{\dot{V}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\dot{V}} {\dot{Q}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\dot{Q}}}$$ V ˙ / Q ˙ ratios were analyzed in 3 gravitational lung regions, leading to precise assessment of their distribution throughout different $${{\dot{V}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\dot{V}} {\dot{Q}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\dot{Q}}}$$ V ˙ / Q ˙ mismatch compartments. Recruitability between the two PEEP levels was measured by the recruitment-to-inflation ratio method. Results In the non-dependent region, at higher PEEP, ventilation reaching the normal $${{\dot{V}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\dot{V}} {\dot{Q}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\dot{Q}}}$$ V ˙ / Q ˙ compartment (p = 0.018) increased, while it decreased in the high $${{\dot{V}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\dot{V}} {\dot{Q}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\dot{Q}}}$$ V ˙ / Q ˙ one (p = 0.023). In the middle region, at PEEP 15 cmH2O, ventilation and perfusion to the low $${{\dot{V}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\dot{V}} {\dot{Q}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\dot{Q}}}$$ V ˙ / Q ˙ compartment decreased (p = 0.006 and p = 0.011) and perfusion to normal $${{\dot{V}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\dot{V}} {\dot{Q}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\dot{Q}}}$$ V ˙ / Q ˙ increased (p = 0.003). In the dependent lung, the percentage of blood flowing through the non-ventilated compartment decreased (p = 0.041). Regional $${{\dot{V}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\dot{V}} {\dot{Q}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\dot{Q}}}$$ V ˙ / Q ˙ mismatch improvement was correlated to lung recruitability and changes in regional tidal volume. Conclusions In patients with ARDS, higher PEEP optimizes the distribution of both ventilation (in the non-dependent areas) and perfusion (in the middle and dependent lung). Bedside measure of recruitability is associated with improved $${{\dot{V}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\dot{V}} {\dot{Q}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\dot{Q}}}$$ V ˙ / Q ˙ mismatch.

Keywords

• Acute lung injury
• Electrical impedance tomography
• Multiple inert gas elimination technique
• Recruitment-on-inflation ratio
• COVID-19