Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (May 2024)

COMPARISON BETWEEN PORTALS FOR PLACEMENT OF ANCHORS IN SHOULDER INSTABILITY

  • José Carlos Souza Vilela,
  • Ivana Duval de Araújo,
  • Mabelly Correa Albuquerque,
  • Anna Luiza Amancio Vidal,
  • Tadeu Fonseca Barbosa,
  • Thalles Leandro Abreu Machado

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220243201e265443
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 32, no. spe1

Abstract

Read online Read online

ABSTRACT Objective: to radiographically compare the effects of anchor positioning in the arthroscopic treatment of shoulder instability, in the 3- and 5-o’clock portals. Methods: retrospective study of 36 patients, operated by two shoulder surgeons at the Unimed BH hospital, between January 2013 and January 2018. Each surgeon used only one of either the 3- or the 5-o’clock portal. After postoperative radiographs we performed angle comparisons between the greatest glenoidal axis, the angle of anchor insertion and distance from the inferior pole. Results: the 5-o’clock portal provided better placement than its 3-o’clock counterpart, which allowed for greater orthogonality in relation to the glenoid rim (p < 0.05). Conclusion: the 5-o’clock portal allowed for better anchor placement than the 3 o’clock one. Level of Evidence II, Clinical Trial.

Keywords