PLoS ONE (Jan 2018)

Confined placental mosaicism revisited: Impact on pregnancy characteristics and outcome.

  • Jérôme Toutain,
  • Damien Goutte-Gattat,
  • Jacques Horovitz,
  • Robert Saura

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195905
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 4
p. e0195905

Abstract

Read online

We wanted to re-evaluate the influence of confined placental mosaicism subtypes (type 2 and type 3) on pregnancy characteristics and outcome.From July 2009 to December 2015, 5512 chorionic villus samplings were performed in our Fetal Medicine Center. Conventional karyotyping was performed after long-term and short-term cultured villi to define type 2 or type 3 confined placental mosaicisms. Karyotype after amniocentesis was performed to exclude true fetal mosaicism, when appropriate. Pregnancy characteristics and outcomes were collected and compared to a control population.Thirty-six (0.65%) confined placental mosaicisms were observed (13 type 2 and 23 type 3). Nuchal translucency was not increased for type 2 and type 3 confined placental mosaicisms. Pregnancy characteristics and outcomes were comparable between type 2 confined placental mosaicisms and the control population. In type 3 confined placental mosaicisms, median first trimester serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein A was lower than for the control population (p<0.001), preterm births were noticed in 56% (p<0.001), small for gestational age newborns in 74% (p<0.001), and adverse pregnancy outcome was reported in 35% (p<0.01).Although type 2 confined placental mosaicisms appeared to have no influence on pregnancy characteristics and outcome, type 3 confined placental mosaicisms were associated with low levels of first trimester serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, preterm birth, small for gestational age newborns, and adverse pregnancy outcomes.