Trials (Oct 2024)

Improving analysis of cognitive outcomes in cardiovascular trials using different statistical approaches

  • Shun Fu Lee,
  • William Whiteley,
  • Jackie Bosch,
  • Laura Sherlock,
  • Tali Cukierman-Yaffe,
  • Martin O’Donnell,
  • John W. Eikelboom,
  • Hertzel C. Gerstein,
  • Shrikant I. Bangdiwala,
  • Graciela Muniz-Terrera

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08482-2
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 25, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) questionnaires are commonly used to measure global cognition in clinical trials. Because these scales are discrete and bounded with ceiling and floor effects and highly skewed, their analysis as continuous outcomes presents challenges. Normality assumptions of linear regression models are usually violated, which may result in failure to detect associations with variables of interest. Methods Alternative approaches to analyzing the results of these cognitive batteries include transformations (standardization, square root, or log transformation) of the scores in the multivariate linear regression (MLR) model, the use of nonlinear beta-binomial regression (which is not dependent on the assumption of normality), or Tobit regression, which adds a latent variable to account for bounded data. We aim to empirically compare the model performance of all proposed approaches using four large randomized controlled trials (ORIGIN, TRANSCEND, COMPASS, and NAVIGATE-ESUS), and using as metrics the Akaike information criterion (AIC). We also compared the treatment effects for the methods that have the same unit of measure (i.e., untransformed MLR, beta-binomial, and Tobit). Results The beta-binomial consistently demonstrated superior model performance, with the lowest AIC values among nearly all the approaches considered, followed by the MLR with square root and log transformations across all four studies. Notably, in ORIGIN, a substantial AIC reduction was observed when comparing the untransformed MLR to the beta-binomial, whereas other studies had relatively small AIC reductions. The beta-binomial model also resulted in a significant treatment effect in ORIGIN, while the untransformed MLR and Tobit regression showed no significance. The other three studies had similar and insignificant treatment effects among the three approaches. Conclusion When analyzing discrete and bounded outcomes, such as cognitive scores, as continuous variables, a beta-binomial regression model improves model performance, avoids spurious significance, and allows for a direct interpretation of the actual cognitive measure. Trials registration ORIGIN (NCT00069784). Registered on October 1, 2003; TRANSCEND (NCT00153101). Registered on September 9, 2005; COMPASS (NCT01776424). Registered on January 24, 2013; NAVIGATE-ESUS (NCT02313909). Registered on December 8, 2014.

Keywords