Urology Annals (Apr 2024)
Transperineal biopsy as a new technique versus well-established transrectal biopsy for diagnosis of prostate cancer – A comparative study
Abstract
Introduction: Transrectal (TR) prostate biopsy has been the gold standard for prostate cancer diagnosis for years. With the emergence of transperineal (TP) prostatic biopsy, there is a shift in practice across medical services to adopt TP biopsy as the primary method of prostatic biopsy. Objective: The objective of the study is to compare cancer detection rates and complications between TP and TR biopsies in our region providing single-center experience with introduction of TP biopsy. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective study utilizing a prospectively designed database comparing consecutive 80 cases of TP biopsy to 80 cases of TR biopsy in a single center. Results: Prebiopsy PSA was 14.2 ± 24.9 ng/dl in the TP group versus 23.7 ± 71.3 ng/dl in the TR group with P = 0.108. Prostate Imaging–Reporting and Data System (PIRAD) 4 and 5 lesions were found in 47 (58.9%) cases of TP biopsy versus 44 (60.3%) of TR group cases and P = 0.131. Cancer was detected in 49 (61.25%) patients in the TP group versus 45 (56.25%) in the TR group with no statistically significant difference and P = 0.665. No cases of hematochezia was reported in TP group, vs 14 (17.5%) reported in TR group with P value <.001. There were no statistically significant differences regarding the incidence of febrile urinary tract infection (UTI), hematuria, and hematospermia in the TP group 0 (0%), 7 (8.75%), and 3 (3.75%) versus 2 (2.50%), 14 (17.50%), and 5 (6.25%) in the TR group with P = 0.497, 0.159, and 0.719 consecutively. Conclusion: TP and TR biopsy have comparable cancer detection rates. TP biopsy has a significantly lower rectal bleeding rate than TR biopsy. There is a trend toward lower febrile UTI in the TP group; however, it did not reach statistical significance.
Keywords
