Majalah Kardiologi Indonesia (Mar 2015)

Lead Removal of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device

  • I Made Putra Swi Antara,
  • Yoga Yuniadi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.30701/ijc.v34i4.382
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 34, no. 4

Abstract

Read online

As more people are living longer with more significant cardiac disease, permanent pacemakers (PPMs) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are being inserted more frequently each year. Beginning early in the 21st century, there has also been an expansion in the indications for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED, a term which includes PPMs and ICDs), and device therapy has become more complex, frequently involving multiple leads per patient. In turn, there will be more occasion where the lead removal for these CIED will be necessary. A 6 y.o. patient was incidentally found to have a fractured pacemaker lead during during routine x-ray for his respiratory tract infection. The pacemaker was inserted 5 years ago, indicated for the permanent total atrioventricular block developed after total correction surgery in Tetralogy of Fallot. The lead fracture was thought to be caused by a phenomenon known as the subclavian crush syndrome. A transvenous lead extraction in this patient was only partially successful, leading to a surgical removal of the remaining lead. A new permanent pacemaker along with a new lead in the apex was successfully inserted before the surgery. There are different levels of recommendations on whether a lead should be extracted or left behind. And in times where removal was needed, new specialized tool and techniques have developed in the last decade for the safe and successful retrieval of implanted pacemaker leads.

Keywords