Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, Santa Maria Hospital, 06100 Perugia, Italy
Chiara Molteni
Infectious Disease Unit, Ospedale A. Manzoni, 23900 Lecco, Italy
Laura Valsecchi
Infectious Disease Unit (I Division), ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, 20157 Milan, Italy
Cecilia Costa
Infectious Diseases Department, SOC 1, USLCENTROFIRENZE, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital, 50012 Florence, Italy
Benedetto Maurizio Celesia
Unit of Infectious Diseases, University of Catania, ARNAS Garibaldi, 95124 Catania, Italy
Giustino Parruti
Infectious Diseases Unit, Pescara General Hospital, 66020 Pescara, Italy
Giovanni Francesco Pellicanò
Unit of Infectious Diseases, Department of Human Pathology of the Adult and the Developmental Age “G. Barresi”, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy
Eleonora Sarchi
Infectious Diseases Unit, SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo Hospital, 15121 Alessandria, Italy
Antonio Cascio
Infectious and Tropical Diseases Unit, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy
Giovanni Cenderello
Infectious Disease Unit, Sanremo Hospital, 18038 Sanremo, Italy
Katia Falasca
Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine and Science of Aging, University “G. d” Annunzio’ Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy
In the last years, many antiretroviral drugs (ART) have been developed with increased efficacy. Nowadays, the main reasons for treatment switches are adverse events, proactive strategy or simplification. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to investigate the reason for treatment interruption in the last 20 years. We merged data of eight cohorts of the SCOLTA project: lopinavir/r (LPV), atazanavir/r (ATV), darunavir/r or /c (DRV), rilpivirine (RPV), raltegravir (RAL), elvitegravir/c (EVG), dolutegravir (DTG) and bictegravir (BIC). We included 4405 people with HIV (PWH). Overall, 664 (15.1%), 489 (11.1%), and 271 (6.2%) PWH interrupted the treatment in the first, second, and third years after starting a new ART. Looking at the interruption in the first year, the most frequent causes were adverse events (3.8%), loss to follow-up (3.7%), patients’ decisions (2.6%), treatment failure (1.7%), and simplification (1.3%). In the multivariate analysis regarding experienced patients, treatment with LPV, ATV, RPV or EVG/c, having less than 250 CD4 cells/mL, history of intravenous drug use, and HCV positivity were associated with an increased risk of interruption. In naive people, only LPV/r was associated with an increased risk of interruption, while RPV was associated with a lower risk. In conclusion, our data on more than 4400 PWH show that adverse events have represented the most frequent cause of treatment interruptions in the first year of ART (3.84%). Treatment discontinuations were more frequent during the first year of follow-up and decreased thereafter. First-generation PI in both naïve and experienced PWH, and EVG/c, in experienced PWH, were associated with a higher risk of treatment interruptions.