International Journal of Infectious Diseases (Oct 2016)

Asplenic patients and invasive pneumococcal disease—how bad is it these days?

  • Thomas J. Marrie,
  • Gregory J. Tyrrell,
  • Sumit R. Majumdar,
  • Dean T. Eurich

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2016.08.022
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 51, no. C
pp. 27 – 30

Abstract

Read online

Objectives: Most are aware of pneumococcal infection as a complication of splenectomy and the increased risk of severe invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in asplenic patients. However little is known of the current status of this entity in a population with an active pneumococcal conjugate vaccine program for children. Methods: All IPD cases reported from 2000 to 2014 in Northern Alberta, Canada were collected prospectively. Socio-demographic variables, clinical characteristics, and IPD-related outcomes were compared between patients with and without a spleen using the Student t-test, Chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Results: Thirty-seven of 2435 patients with IPD (1.5%) were asplenic. Asplenic patients were significantly more likely to require mechanical ventilation or admission to the intensive care unit and had more complications (e.g., acute kidney injury). However, in-hospital mortality rates were similar in those with and without a spleen (19% vs. 16%, p = 0.58). Pneumococcal serotype 22B was 33-fold higher in asplenic patients compared to those with a spleen. Conclusions: In patients with IPD, those who are asplenic have a more severe infection than those with a spleen; however, the mortality rate is not significantly different. The reason for the predominance of serotype 22B requires further investigation and if replicated may warrant attention to current vaccination strategies.

Keywords