Remote Sensing (Aug 2022)

Effects of Low Temperature on the Relationship between Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Gross Primary Productivity across Different Plant Function Types

  • Jidai Chen,
  • Xinjie Liu,
  • Yan Ma,
  • Liangyun Liu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14153716
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 15
p. 3716

Abstract

Read online

Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) has been recognized as a proxy of gross primary production (GPP) across various terrestrial biomes. However, the effects of low temperature on SIF and GPP among different plant function types (PFTs) have not yet been well-explored. To gain a better understanding of the relationship between SIF and GPP, we investigated the variation in the GPP/SIF ratio in response to low-temperature conditions using satellite and tower-based datasets. Based on the TROPOMI SIF product and FLUXCOM GPP data, we found that the SIF and GPP exhibited consistent seasonal and spatial patterns, while the GPP/SIF ratio differed for different PFTs. The GPP/SIF ratio for forest types was generally higher than 10 gC·d−1·mw−1·nm·sr, whereas the GPP/SIF ratio for grass and crop types was generally lower than 10 gC·d−1·mw−1·nm·sr. In addition, there were noticeable differences in the seasonal pattern of the GPP/SIF ratio between the selected samples that experienced low-temperature stress (below 10 °C, defined as group A) and those that grew under relatively warm conditions (above 10 °C throughout the year, defined as group B). The GPP/SIF ratio for group A generally exhibited a “hump-shaped” seasonal pattern, and that for group B showed a slightly “bowl-shaped” seasonal pattern, which means it is important to consider the effects of temperature on the SIF-GPP relationship. Through linear regression and correlation analysis, we demonstrate that there was a positive correlation between the GPP/SIF ratio and temperature for group A, with a wide temperature range including low-temperature conditions, indicating that, in this case, temperature affected the SIF–GPP relationship; however, for group B—with a temperature higher than 10 °C throughout the year—the GPP/SIF ratio was not consistently affected by temperature. The response of GPP/SIF to low temperature stress was confirmed by tower-based observations at a C3 cropland (C3CRO) site and a boreal evergreen needleleaf forest (BoENF) site. Although the relationship between the GPP/SIF ratio and temperature differed among PFTs, the GPP/SIF ratio decreased under low-temperature conditions for PFTs. Therefore, the GPP/SIF ratio was not constant and was largely influenced by low temperature for different PFTs, thus highlighting the importance of incorporating temperature into SIF-based GPP estimation.

Keywords