Royal Society Open Science (Feb 2023)

The process of replication target selection in psychology: what to consider?

  • Merle-Marie Pittelkow,
  • Sarahanne M. Field,
  • Peder M. Isager,
  • Anna E. van’t Veer,
  • Thomas Anderson,
  • Scott N. Cole,
  • Tomáš Dominik,
  • Roger Giner-Sorolla,
  • Sebahat Gok,
  • Tom Heyman,
  • Marc Jekel,
  • Timothy J. Luke,
  • David B. Mitchell,
  • Rik Peels,
  • Rosina Pendrous,
  • Samuel Sarrazin,
  • Jacob M. Schauer,
  • Eva Specker,
  • Ulrich S. Tran,
  • Marek A. Vranka,
  • Jelte M. Wicherts,
  • Naoto Yoshimura,
  • Rolf A. Zwaan,
  • Don van Ravenzwaaij

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.210586
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 2

Abstract

Read online

Increased execution of replication studies contributes to the effort to restore credibility of empirical research. However, a second generation of problems arises: the number of potential replication targets is at a serious mismatch with available resources. Given limited resources, replication target selection should be well-justified, systematic and transparently communicated. At present the discussion on what to consider when selecting a replication target is limited to theoretical discussion, self-reported justifications and a few formalized suggestions. In this Registered Report, we proposed a study involving the scientific community to create a list of considerations for consultation when selecting a replication target in psychology. We employed a modified Delphi approach. First, we constructed a preliminary list of considerations. Second, we surveyed psychologists who previously selected a replication target with regards to their considerations. Third, we incorporated the results into the preliminary list of considerations and sent the updated list to a group of individuals knowledgeable about concerns regarding replication target selection. Over the course of several rounds, we established consensus regarding what to consider when selecting a replication target. The resulting checklist can be used for transparently communicating the rationale for selecting studies for replication.

Keywords