International Journal of General Medicine (Sep 2015)

Practical and clinical considerations in assessing patients with atrial fibrillation for switching to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in primary care

  • Guimarães PO,
  • Kaatz S,
  • Lopes RD

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2015, no. default
pp. 283 – 291

Abstract

Read online

Patrícia O Guimarães,1 Scott Kaatz,2 Renato D Lopes11Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke Medicine, Durham, NC, 2Hurley Medical Center, Flint, MI, USAAbstract: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an important risk factor for thromboembolic events, and anticoagulation therapy can reduce this risk. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), such as warfarin, have been used for decades in patients with AF for stroke prevention. Currently, non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are approved and available for non-valvular AF patients who are at increased risk of stroke. These agents are safe and effective and have important advantages over VKAs, such as significant reduction in intracranial hemorrhage and no need for routine laboratory monitoring. Thus, should all VKA-treated patients be switched to a NOAC? The aims of this article are: 1) to review the advantages of NOACs over VKAs; 2) to identify the group of patients who most benefit from receiving a NOAC and, therefore, are higher priority to be switched from VKAs; and 3) to provide clinical and practical guidance on how to switch patients safely from VKAs to NOACs.Keywords: anticoagulation, atrial fibrillation, clinical practice, stroke prevention