Comparison of Testing Designs for Flexural Strength of 3Y-TZP and 5Y-PSZ Considering Different Surface Treatment

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of different surface treatments and the corresponding surface roughness on the ball-on-three-balls test and piston-on-three-balls test for measuring flexural strength 3Y-TZP and 5Y-PSZ. Additionally, the influence of cutting the material into the specimens when pre-sintered or fully sintered was analyzed. A total of 120 specimens for each material group, 3Y-TZP zirconia (Katana HT, Kuraray) and the 4 different layers of multilayered 5Y-PSZ zirconia (Katana UTML, Kuraray), were produced. The used material was cut into half of the specimens in a fully sintered stage, the other half was cut when pre-sintered. Each subgroup was divided into 3 different surface treatment groups being air abraded with 50 µm alumina particles at 1 bar pressure, ground with 600 SiC paper or polished up to 1 µm with a polycristalline diamond suspension. These were then analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) (N = 3) and tested for flexural strength using the ball-on-three-balls test (N = 10) or piston-on-three-balls test (N = 10). For 3Y-TZP groups different surface roughness did not result in statistically significant differences in flexural strength but cutting the specimens in fully sintered state significantly reduced flexural strength of 1133 ± 109 to 741 ± 81 MPa. For 5Y-PSZ groups air abrasion of the specimens with alumina particles significantly reduced the flexural strength of 562 ± 68 MPa to 358 ± 58 MPa. Cutting and surface treatment in pre-sintered or fully sintered state had no significant influence. Flexural strength testing with the ball-on-three-balls test resulted in about 20% higher strengths compared to the piston-on-three-balls test. Results of both tests showed the same tendencies when compared.

Keywords

• zirconia
• 3Y-TZP
• 5Y-PSZ
• flexural strength testing