Critical Care (Jun 2022)

Association of annual hospital septic shock case volume and hospital mortality

  • Yan Chen,
  • Xu-dong Ma,
  • Xiao-hui Kang,
  • Si-fa Gao,
  • Jin-min Peng,
  • Shan Li,
  • Da-wei Liu,
  • Xiang Zhou,
  • Li Weng,
  • Bin Du,
  • China National Critical Care Quality Control Center Group

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04035-8
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 26, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The burden of sepsis remains high in China. The relationship between case volume and hospital mortality among patients with septic shock, the most severe complication of sepsis, is unknown in China. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed surveillance data from a national quality improvement program in intensive care units (ICUs) in China in 2020. Association between septic shock case volume and hospital mortality was analyzed using multivariate linear regression and restricted cubic splines. Results We enrolled a total of 134,046 septic shock cases in ICUs from 1902 hospitals in China during 2020. In this septic shock cohort, the median septic shock volume per hospital was 33 cases (interquartile range 14–76 cases), 41.4% were female, and more than half of the patients were over 61 years old, with average hospital mortality of 21.2%. An increase in case volume was associated with improved survival among septic shock cases. In the linear regression model, the highest quartile of septic shock volume was associated with lower hospital mortality compared with the lowest quartile (β − 0.86; 95% CI − 0.98, − 0.74; p < 0.001). Similar differences were found in hospitals of respective geographic locations and hospital levels. With case volume modeled as a continuous variable in a restricted cubic spline, a lower volume threshold of 40 cases before which a substantial reduction of the hospital mortality rate was observed. Conclusions The findings suggest that hospitals with higher septic shock case volume have lower hospital mortality in China. Further research is needed to explain the mechanism of this volume–outcome relationship.

Keywords