Evaluation of a Temperature/Humidity Data Logger for the Usage in Cattle Barns
Malina Flessner,
Felix König,
Christian Guse,
Michael Iwersen,
Daniela Klein-Jöbstl
Affiliations
Malina Flessner
Veterinary Systems Transformation and Sustainability, Clinical Department Farm Animals and Food System Science, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinaerplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria
Felix König
Veterinary Systems Transformation and Sustainability, Clinical Department Farm Animals and Food System Science, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinaerplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria
Christian Guse
Veterinary Systems Transformation and Sustainability, Clinical Department Farm Animals and Food System Science, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinaerplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria
Michael Iwersen
Veterinary Systems Transformation and Sustainability, Clinical Department Farm Animals and Food System Science, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinaerplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria
Daniela Klein-Jöbstl
Veterinary Systems Transformation and Sustainability, Clinical Department Farm Animals and Food System Science, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinaerplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria
Climate change is a worldwide problem that is manifested in livestock farming with a decrease in animal health and welfare and economic losses due to heat stress. Therefore, a precise and continuous recording of the barn climate is essential to be able to implement actions at a certain threshold. The aim of this study was to evaluate a logger for temperature and humidity (Kestrel Drop D2) marketed for on-farm use in comparison to various other temperature/humidity data loggers under field conditions. Four different sensors were used and placed in different settings in cattle barns to correlate temperature and humidity measurements. Data were recorded for over a year in total. The data were very highly correlated. Furthermore, the area under the curve for the evaluated logger in comparison to the other ones was 0.99 to 1.0, using a temperature–humidity index cut-off of 72, often set to define heat stress. In conclusion, the evaluated logger performed equally well as the other used devices. For on-farm use, it is suitable.