American Heart Journal Plus (Apr 2024)

Physicians approach shared decision-making for sports eligibility decisions heterogeneously

  • Sarah C. Montembeau,
  • Jonathan H. Kim,
  • Christine M. Baugh,
  • Eric G. Campbell,
  • Aaron L. Baggish,
  • Neal W. Dickert

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 40
p. 100371

Abstract

Read online

Background: There is limited data regarding how clinicians operationalize shared decision-making (SDM) with athletes with cardiovascular diagnoses. This study was designed to explore sports cardiologists' conceptions of SDM and approaches to sports eligibility decisions. Methods: 20 sports cardiologists were interviewed by telephone or video conference from October 2022 to May 2023. Qualitative descriptive analysis was conducted with the transcripts. Results: All participants endorsed SDM for eligibility decisions, however, SDM was defined and operationalized heterogeneously. Only 6 participants specifically referenced eliciting patient preferences during SDM. Participants described variable roles for the physician in SDM and variable views on athletes' understanding, perception, and tolerance of risk. Participants thresholds for prohibitive annual risk of sudden cardiac death ranged from 10 %. Conclusions: These findings reinforce the general acceptance of SDM for sports eligibility decisions and highlight the need to better understand this process and identify the most effective approach for operationalization.

Keywords