Journal of Personalized Medicine (Jun 2023)

Parents’ Perspectives on the Utility of Genomic Sequencing in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

  • Amy A. Lemke,
  • Michelle L. Thompson,
  • Emily C. Gimpel,
  • Katelyn C. McNamara,
  • Carla A. Rich,
  • Candice R. Finnila,
  • Meagan E. Cochran,
  • James M. J. Lawlor,
  • Kelly M. East,
  • Kevin M. Bowling,
  • Donald R. Latner,
  • Susan M. Hiatt,
  • Michelle D. Amaral,
  • Whitley V. Kelley,
  • Veronica Greve,
  • David E. Gray,
  • Stephanie A. Felker,
  • Hannah Meddaugh,
  • Ashley Cannon,
  • Amanda Luedecke,
  • Kelly E. Jackson,
  • Laura G. Hendon,
  • Hillary M. Janani,
  • Marla Johnston,
  • Lee Ann Merin,
  • Sarah L. Deans,
  • Carly Tuura,
  • Trent Hughes,
  • Heather Williams,
  • Kelly Laborde,
  • Matthew B. Neu,
  • Jessica Patrick-Esteve,
  • Anna C. E. Hurst,
  • Brian M. Kirmse,
  • Renate Savich,
  • Steven B. Spedale,
  • Sara J. Knight,
  • Gregory S. Barsh,
  • Bruce R. Korf,
  • Gregory M. Cooper,
  • Kyle B. Brothers

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13071026
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 7
p. 1026

Abstract

Read online

Background: It is critical to understand the wide-ranging clinical and non-clinical effects of genome sequencing (GS) for parents in the NICU context. We assessed parents’ experiences with GS as a first-line diagnostic tool for infants with suspected genetic conditions in the NICU. Methods: Parents of newborns (N = 62) suspected of having a genetic condition were recruited across five hospitals in the southeast United States as part of the SouthSeq study. Semi-structured interviews (N = 78) were conducted after parents received their child’s sequencing result (positive, negative, or variants of unknown significance). Thematic analysis was performed on all interviews. Results: Key themes included that (1) GS in infancy is important for reproductive decision making, preparing for the child’s future care, ending the diagnostic odyssey, and sharing results with care providers; (2) the timing of disclosure was acceptable for most parents, although many reported the NICU environment was overwhelming; and (3) parents deny that receiving GS results during infancy exacerbated parent–infant bonding, and reported variable impact on their feelings of guilt. Conclusion: Parents reported that GS during the neonatal period was useful because it provided a “backbone” for their child’s care. Parents did not consistently endorse negative impacts like interference with parent–infant bonding.

Keywords