Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle (Feb 2021)

Inflammation‐induced cholestasis in cancer cachexia

  • Morgane M. Thibaut,
  • Martina Sboarina,
  • Martin Roumain,
  • Sarah A. Pötgens,
  • Audrey M. Neyrinck,
  • Florence Destrée,
  • Justine Gillard,
  • Isabelle A. Leclercq,
  • Guillaume Dachy,
  • Jean‐Baptiste Demoulin,
  • Anne Tailleux,
  • Sophie Lestavel,
  • Marialetizia Rastelli,
  • Amandine Everard,
  • Patrice D. Cani,
  • Paolo E. Porporato,
  • Audrey Loumaye,
  • Jean‐Paul Thissen,
  • Giulio G. Muccioli,
  • Nathalie M. Delzenne,
  • Laure B. Bindels

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12652
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 1
pp. 70 – 90

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Cancer cachexia is a debilitating metabolic syndrome contributing to cancer death. Organs other than the muscle may contribute to the pathogenesis of cancer cachexia. This work explores new mechanisms underlying hepatic alterations in cancer cachexia. Methods We used transcriptomics to reveal the hepatic gene expression profile in the colon carcinoma 26 cachectic mouse model. We performed bile acid, tissue mRNA, histological, biochemical, and western blot analyses. Two interventional studies were performed using a neutralizing interleukin 6 antibody and a bile acid sequestrant, cholestyramine. Our findings were evaluated in a cohort of 94 colorectal cancer patients with or without cachexia (43/51). Results In colon carcinoma 26 cachectic mice, we discovered alterations in five inflammatory pathways as well as in other pathways, including bile acid metabolism, fatty acid metabolism, and xenobiotic metabolism (normalized enrichment scores of −1.97, −2.16, and −1.34, respectively; all Padj < 0.05). The hepatobiliary transport system was deeply impaired in cachectic mice, leading to increased systemic and hepatic bile acid levels (+1512 ± 511.6 pmol/mg, P = 0.01) and increased hepatic inflammatory cytokines and neutrophil recruitment to the liver of cachectic mice (+43.36 ± 16.01 neutrophils per square millimetre, P = 0.001). Adaptive mechanisms were set up to counteract this bile acid accumulation by repressing bile acid synthesis and by enhancing alternative routes of basolateral bile acid efflux. Targeting bile acids using cholestyramine reduced hepatic inflammation, without affecting the hepatobiliary transporters (e.g. tumour necrosis factor α signalling via NFκB and inflammatory response pathways, normalized enrichment scores of −1.44 and −1.36, all Padj < 0.05). Reducing interleukin 6 levels counteracted the change in expression of genes involved in the hepatobiliary transport, bile acid synthesis, and inflammation. Serum bile acid levels were increased in cachectic vs. non‐cachectic cancer patients (e.g. total bile acids, +5.409 ± 1.834 μM, P = 0.026) and were strongly correlated to systemic inflammation (taurochenodeoxycholic acid and C‐reactive protein: ρ = 0.36, Padj = 0.017). Conclusions We show alterations in bile acid metabolism and hepatobiliary secretion in cancer cachexia. In this context, we demonstrate the contribution of systemic inflammation to the impairment of the hepatobiliary transport system and the role played by bile acids in the hepatic inflammation. This work paves the way to a better understanding of the role of the liver in cancer cachexia.

Keywords