International Journal of Molecular Sciences (Jul 2024)

Exorbital Lacrimal Gland Ablation and Regrafting Induce Inflammation but Not Regeneration or Dry Eye

  • Adriana de Andrade Batista Murashima,
  • Ariane M. S. Sant’Ana,
  • Jacqueline Ferreira Faustino-Barros,
  • Elísio B. Machado Filho,
  • Lilian Costa Mendes da Silva,
  • Marina Zilio Fantucci,
  • Carolina Maria Módulo,
  • Fernando Chahud,
  • Denny Marcos Garcia,
  • Eduardo M. Rocha

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25158318
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 25, no. 15
p. 8318

Abstract

Read online

The study evaluated the regenerative responses of the lacrimal functional unit (LFU) after lacrimal gland (LG) ablation. The LG of Wistar rats was submitted to G1) partial LG ablation, G2) partial ablation and transplantation of an allogeneic LG, or G3) total LG ablation, (n = 7–10/group). The eye wipe test, slit lamp image, tear flow, and histology were evaluated. RT-PCR analyzed inflammatory and proliferation mediators. The findings were compared to naïve controls after 1 and 2 months (M1 and M2). G3 presented increased corneal sensitivity, and the 3 groups showed corneal neovascularization. Histology revealed changes in the LG and corneal inflammation. In the LG, there was an increase in MMP-9 mRNA of G1 and G2 at M1 and M2, in RUNX-1 at M1 and M2 in G1, in RUNX-3 mRNA at M1 in G1, and at M2 in G2. TNF-α mRNA rose in the corneas of G1 and G2 at M2. There was an increase in the IL-1β mRNA in the trigeminal ganglion of G1 at M1. Without changes in tear flow or evidence of LG regeneration, LG ablation and grafting are unreliable models for dry eye or LG repair in rats. The surgical manipulation extended inflammation to the LFU.

Keywords