Critical Care (Sep 2023)

Single-plane versus real-time biplane approaches for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in critical care patients: a randomized controlled trial

  • Ying-Ying Li,
  • Yi-Hao Liu,
  • Lin Yan,
  • Jing Xiao,
  • Xin-Yang Li,
  • Jun Ma,
  • Li-Gang Jia,
  • Rui Chen,
  • Chao Zhang,
  • Zhen Yang,
  • Ming-Bo Zhang,
  • Yu-Kun Luo

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04635-y
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 27, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Critical care patients often require central venous cannulation (CVC). We hypothesized that real-time biplane ultrasound-guided CVC would improve first-puncture success rate and reduce mechanical complications. The purpose of this study was to compare the success rate and safety of single-plane and real-time biplane approaches for ultrasound-guided CVC. Methods From October 2022 to March 2023, 256 participants with critical illness requiring CVC were randomized to either the single-plane (n = 128) or biplane (n = 128) ultrasound-guided cannulation groups. The success rate, number of punctures, procedure duration, incidence of catheterization-related complications, and confidence score of operators were documented. Results The central vein was successfully cannulated in all 256 participants (163 [64%] man and 93 [36%] women; mean age 69 ± 19 [range 13–104 years]), including 182 and 74 who underwent internal jugular vein cannulation (IJVC) and femoral vein cannulation (FVC), respectively. The incidence of successful puncture on the first attempt was higher in the biplane group than that in the single-plane group (91.6% vs. 74.7%; relative risk (RR), 1.226; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.069–1.405; P = 0.002 for the IJVC and 90.9% vs. 68.3%; RR, 1.331; 95% CI, 1.053–1.684; P = 0.019 for the FVC). The biplane group was also associated with a higher first-puncture single-pass catheterization success rate (87.4% vs. 69.0% and 90.9% vs. 68.3%), fewer undesired punctures (1[1–1(1–2)] vs. 1[1–2(1–4)] and 1[1–1(1–3)] vs. 1[1–2(1–4)]), shorter cannulation time (205 s [162–283 (66–1,526)] vs. 311 s [243–401 (136–1,223)] and 228 s [193–306 (66–1,669)] vs. 340 s [246–499 (130–944)]), and fewer immediate complications (10.5% vs. 28.7% and 9.1% vs. 34.1%) for both IJVC and FVC (all P < 0.05). Conclusion Real-time biplane imaging of ultrasound-guided CVCs offers advantages over the single-plane approach for critically ill patients. Trial registration: This prospective RCT was registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200064843). Registered 19 October 2022.

Keywords