Emerging Infectious Diseases (Jul 2024)

COVID-19 Death Determination Methods, Minnesota, USA, 2020–2022

  • Lydia J. Fess,
  • Ashley Fell,
  • Siobhan O’Toole,
  • Paige D’Heilly,
  • Stacy Holzbauer,
  • Leslie Kollmann,
  • Amanda Markelz,
  • Keeley Morris,
  • Abbey Ruhland,
  • Scott Seys,
  • Elizabeth Schiffman,
  • Haley Wienkes,
  • Zachary Zirnhelt,
  • Stephanie Meyer,
  • Kathryn Como-Sabetti

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3007.231522
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 30, no. 7
pp. 1352 – 1360

Abstract

Read online

Accurate and timely mortality surveillance is crucial for elucidating risk factors, particularly for emerging diseases. We compared use of COVID-19 keywords on death certificates alone to identify COVID-19 deaths in Minnesota, USA, during 2020–2022, with use of a standardized mortality definition incorporating additional clinical data. For analyses, we used likelihood ratio χ2 and median 1-way tests. Death certificates alone identified 96% of COVID-19 deaths confirmed by the standardized definition and an additional 3% of deaths that had been classified as non–COVID-19 deaths by the standardized definition. Agreement between methods was >90% for most groups except children, although agreement among adults varied by demographics and location at death. Overall median time from death to filing of death certificate was 3 days; decedent characteristics and whether autopsy was performed varied. Death certificates are an efficient and timely source of COVID-19 mortality data when paired with SARS-CoV-2 testing data.

Keywords