Blood Advances (Nov 2019)

Overexpression of WT1 and PRAME predicts poor outcomes of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes with thrombocytopenia

  • Qiu-Sha Huang,
  • Jing-Zhi Wang,
  • Ya-Zhen Qin,
  • Qiao-Zhu Zeng,
  • Qian Jiang,
  • Hao Jiang,
  • Jin Lu,
  • Hui-Xin Liu,
  • Yi Liu,
  • Jing-Bo Wang,
  • Li Su,
  • Hong-Yu Zhang,
  • Zhen-Ling Li,
  • Su-Jun Gao,
  • Bo Huang,
  • Yu-Ying Liu,
  • Yan-Rong Liu,
  • Lan-Ping Xu,
  • Xiao-Jun Huang,
  • Xiao-Hui Zhang

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3, no. 21
pp. 3406 – 3418

Abstract

Read online

Abstract: Thrombocytopenia is associated with life-threatening bleeding and is common in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Robust molecular prognostic biomarkers need to be developed to improve clinical decision making for patients with MDS with thrombocytopenia. Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) and preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) are promising immunogenic antigen candidates for immunotherapy, and their clinical effects on patients with MDS with thrombocytopenia are still not well understood. We performed a multicenter observational study of adult patients with MDS with thrombocytopenia from 7 different tertiary medical centers in China. We examined bone marrow samples collected at diagnosis for WT1 and PRAME transcript levels and then analyzed their prognostic effect for patients with MDS with thrombocytopenia. In total, we enrolled 1110 patients diagnosed with MDS with thrombocytopenia. Overexpression of WT1 and PRAME was associated with elevated blast percentage, worse cytogenetics, and higher Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) risk. Further, both WT1 and PRAME overexpression were independent poor prognostic factors for acute myeloid leukemia evolution, overall survival, and progression-free survival. Together, the 2 genes overexpression identified a population of patients with MDS with substantially worse survival. On the basis of WT1 and PRAME transcript levels, patients with MDS with IPSS-R low risk were classified into 2 significantly divergent prognostic risk groups: a low-favorable group and a low-adverse group. The low-adverse group had survival similar to that of patients in the intermediate-risk group. Our study demonstrates that the evaluation of WT1/PRAME transcript analysis may improve the prognostication precision and better risk-stratify the patients.