Infection and Drug Resistance (Sep 2022)

Efficacy and Safety of Combination Antifungals as Empirical, Preemptive, and Targeted Therapies for Invasive Fungal Infections in Intensive-Care Units

  • Yang Q,
  • Xie J,
  • Cai Y,
  • Wang N,
  • Wang Y,
  • Zhang L,
  • Li Y,
  • Yu J,
  • Li Y,
  • Wang H,
  • Zhang K

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 15
pp. 5331 – 5344

Abstract

Read online

Qianting Yang, Jiao Xie, Yan Cai, Na Wang, Yan Wang, Li Zhang, Youjia Li, Jingjie Yu, Ya Li, Haitao Wang, Kanghuai Zhang Department of Pharmacy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Kanghuai Zhang, Department of Pharmacy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, No. 157 Xiwu Road, Xi’an, 710004, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-29-87679282, Email [email protected]: To determine whether combinations of antifungal drugs are effective and safe for patients in intensive-care units.Methods: This study compared the efficacy and safety of caspofungin (CAS), voriconazole (VOR), amphotericin B liposome (L-AmB), CAS+VOR, and CAS+L-AmB as empirical, preemptive, and targeted therapies for invasive fungal infection (IFI).Results: Comparing the CAS, VOR, and CAS+VOR groups revealed that there were no differences in response rates between all therapy types, IFI-associated death within 90 days was less common in the CAS+VOR group (1.8%) than the VOR group (14.3%), and there were more adverse events in the VOR group than in the CAS group (P < 0.05). For empirical or preemptive therapy, the CAS group had a better response rate (80.0%) than the CAS+VOR group (47.1%), and there were more adverse events in the VOR group than in the CAS group (P < 0.05). For targeted therapy, no differences were found for efficacy and safety. There were no differences among the CAS, L-AmB, and CAS+L-AmB groups in efficacy and safety.Conclusion: Patients who received CAS monotherapy as an empirical or preemptive therapy could achieve good outcomes. Patients who received CAS+VOR or CAS+L-AmB achieved almost the same outcomes when compared with those who received CAS, VOR, and L-AmB monotherapy as targeted therapies, but those who received CAS+VOR had a lower IFI mortality rate than did those who received VOR monotherapy.Keywords: caspofungin, voriconazole, amphotericin B liposome, combination therapy, invasive fungal infection, intensive-care units

Keywords