Journal of Medical Internet Research (Dec 2020)

The Online Health Information Needs of Family Physicians: Systematic Review of Qualitative and Quantitative Studies

  • van der Keylen, Piet,
  • Tomandl, Johanna,
  • Wollmann, Katharina,
  • Möhler, Ralph,
  • Sofroniou, Mario,
  • Maun, Andy,
  • Voigt-Radloff, Sebastian,
  • Frank, Luca

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/18816
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 22, no. 12
p. e18816

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundDigitalization and the increasing availability of online information have changed the way in which information is searched for and retrieved by the public and by health professionals. The technical developments in the last two decades have transformed the methods of information retrieval. Although systematic evidence exists on the general information needs of specialists, and in particular, family physicians (FPs), there have been no recent systematic reviews to specifically address the needs of FPs and any barriers that may exist to accessing online health information. ObjectiveThis review aims to provide an up-to-date perspective on the needs of FPs in searching, retrieving, and using online information. MethodsThis systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies searched a multitude of databases spanning the years 2000 to 2020 (search date January 2020). Studies that analyzed the online information needs of FPs, any barriers to the accessibility of information, and their information-seeking behaviors were included. Two researchers independently scrutinized titles and abstracts, analyzing full-text papers for their eligibility, the studies therein, and the data obtained from them. ResultsThe initial search yielded 4541 studies for initial title and abstract screening. Of the 144 studies that were found to be eligible for full-text screening, 41 were finally included. A total of 20 themes were developed and summarized into 5 main categories: individual needs of FPs before the search; access needs, including factors that would facilitate or hinder information retrieval; quality needs of the information to hand; utilization needs of the information available; and implication needs for everyday practice. ConclusionsThis review suggests that searching, accessing, and using online information, as well as any pre-existing needs, barriers, or demands, should not be perceived as separate entities but rather be regarded as a sequential process. Apart from accessing information and evaluating its quality, FPs expressed concerns regarding the applicability of this information to their everyday practice and its subsequent relevance to patient care. Future online information resources should cater to the needs of the primary care setting and seek to address the way in which such resources may be adapted to these specific requirements.